Hi Elena,
Great post! I really appreciated your deep dive into Open Pedagogy and the core principles that drive it. It’s exciting to see how you underscore the shift from traditional teaching to a model that champions student empowerment and collaborative learning. Your enthusiasm for Open Educational Resources (OER) shines through, especially when you talk about their adaptability and how they’ve personally enhanced your learning journey.
I’m also impressed with how you navigate Creative Commons licensing to ethically use and share materials. It’s super helpful to hear about these practical applications in a real-world context.
Thanks for such a vibrant and informative exploration of these educational strategies!
Hi Amira,
Great post on Open Pedagogy and OER! You’ve effectively highlighted how these resources can transform educational experiences by fostering active participation and collaboration. Your discussion on Creative Commons licensing also thoughtfully emphasizes the benefits of sharing knowledge openly and responsibly.
Building on your points, I’m curious about how addressing the digital divide might further enhance the reach and effectiveness of OER, particularly in less-resourced areas. Your blog encourages deeper consideration of how we can provide all learners with the tools they need to fully benefit from open educational resources.
Thanks for sharing your insights!
My academic journey has been profoundly influenced by the discovery and use of Open Educational Resources (OER). These resources have opened up new ways for me to access, interact with, and understand course materials, making learning more adaptable and accessible.
Open Pedagogy has revolutionized the traditional teaching model by fostering an environment where learning is a collaborative process. Unlike conventional methods that often promote a passive reception of information, Open Pedagogy encourages active participation and co-creation of learning materials, which provides a larger toolbox of knowledge for educators and students alike. This approach has empowered me to take a more active role in my education, allowing for a deeper connection with the course content.
A standout example of Open Pedagogy in action was during on elf my sociology seminar classes last year. The majority of the semester was dedicated to student-driven learning, where we worked in pairs to teach the entire class. Each group selected a topic, developed a comprehensive presentation, and then led the class discussion. This method not only enhanced our understanding of the sociological concepts, but also honed our skills in research, presentation, and collaboration, embodying the core attributes of Open Pedagogy such as student-centered learning and empowerment.
The experience in my sociology class is a testament to how Open Pedagogy can transform the educational experience. Katherine Cadwell’s TEDx talk on how students should lead the classroom further underscores this point. She discusses the shift from teach-led to student-centered learning, which resonates deeply with my own experiences. Her insights serve as a powerful reminder of the potential of Open Pedagogy to create educational environments where students feel genuinely involved and valued.
OER have been instrumental in my studies, providing accessible, high-quality resources at no cost. These resources have alleviated the financial burdens associated with expensive textbooks and offered diverse learning tools that cater to different academic needs and learning styles. Katie Gosa’s Tedx talk on OER highlights how these resources reduce educational costs and improve accessibility, further enhancing the equitable and innovative nature of teaching methods across diverse educational landscapes.
The adoption of OER and the principles of Open Pedagogy have not only facilitated my personal and academic growth but also subtly influenced my perspective on education. These approaches encourage a more connected, accessible, and flexible educational environment, where learners and educators alike can thrive.
Resources:
Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of Open Pedagogy: A Model for Using Open Educational Resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383
https://connectedlearningpathways.ca/category/edci-339-a01-module-4/
Blog URL: https://katenelsonstudies.opened.ca/blog-post-4-embracing-open-pedagogy/
Hi Elena,
Fantastic post on Universal Design for Learning (UDL)! You’ve highlighted how UDL promotes inclusivity in both physical and digital classrooms by providing various engagement methods. It’s great how you connect these principles to ensure every student finds a learning format that suits them.
Expanding on your points, integrating UDL with tools that support social emotional learning (SEL) – such as online bulletin boards for check-ins – could further enhance online environments, making them more inclusive and responsive to student needs during transitions between in-person and remote learning.
Your example of moving dance classes online showcases UDL’s practical application in maintaining educational continuity.
Thank you for sharing!
EDCI 335 Spring 2025
Ella Meldrum, Kate Nelson, Omid Izadi
British Columbia is home to a diverse range of native tree species, shaped by the province’s varied climates and ecosystems. Accurately identifying these trees is crucial for forest management, conservation efforts, and ecological research. Tree identification relies on several key characteristics, including leaf morphology, bark texture, reproductive structures, and habitat preferences. Some of the most common native trees in BC include Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western redcedar (Thuja plicata), Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), and Garry oak (Quercus garryana). Douglas-fir is distinguished by its thick, furrowed bark and pointed buds, making it one of the most widespread conifers in the province. Western redcedar, known for its reddish-brown, peeling bark and scale-like leaves, dominates coastal rainforests and holds cultural significance for Indigenous communities. Sitka spruce thrives in moist coastal environments and is identifiable by its sharp, stiff needles and thin, scaly bark. Garry oak, BC’s only native oak species, features lobed leaves and rough, ridged bark, mainly found in the province’s southern regions.
The learning context focuses on elementary school students. These students are in the early stages of developing an understanding of their natural environment and are naturally curious about the world around them, and it is important to help them develop meaningful connections with the surrounding environment.
Educational Background & Prior Knowledge
Specific Learning Needs
Constructivism:
The constructivist learning theory emphasizes that learners build knowledge through active exploration, experience, and social interaction rather than passive memorization. In this approach, students construct their own understanding by engaging with real-world concepts, asking questions, and drawing connections to prior knowledge. Learning is most effective when students interact with their environment, engage in hands-on activities, and collaborate with peers. Constructivism encourages critical thinking and inquiry, making it particularly useful for subjects that involve observation, classification, and pattern recognition, such as tree identification.
Rationale:
This theory is well-suited for teaching tree identification in BC because it allows students to engage directly with their surroundings, reinforcing learning through observation, discussion, and practical application. Instead of simply reading about trees, students participate in nature walks, sketching, and interactive identification exercises, making the learning process experiential and meaningful. By constructing their own understanding, students are more likely to retain information, develop problem-solving skills, and foster a connection with the natural environment. This approach also encourages environmental awareness and conservation, as students learn not just to recognize trees but to appreciate their ecological significance.
The inquiry-based learning design encourages students to explore, ask questions, and actively seek answers through observation and investigation. Instead of passively receiving information, learners take an active role in constructing knowledge by engaging in hands-on activities, such as nature walks, tree identification exercises, and collaborative discussions. This design aligns with the principles of constructivism, allowing students to build understanding through real-world experiences and guided discovery. Inquiry learning promotes critical thinking, problem-solving, and curiosity, making it an ideal approach for topics that involve classification, observation, and environmental awareness.
This learning design is particularly effective for teaching tree identification in BC because it immerses students in their natural environment, making the learning process engaging and meaningful. By exploring local trees, students observe differences firsthand, test hypotheses, and refine their understanding through trial and discussion. Inquiry-based activities, such as identification games, nature journaling, and peer discussions, help learners develop pattern recognition skills and connect knowledge to their daily lives. Additionally, this approach fosters a sense of environmental stewardship, encouraging students to appreciate and protect their surroundings. By allowing learners to actively participate in their own discovery process, inquiry-based learning makes tree identification both interactive and impactful.
To ensure all students can engage meaningfully with the tree identification resource, we apply Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles from CAST. These principles, Multiple Means of Engagement, Representation, and Action & Expression ensure accessibility, flexibility, and inclusivity.
Students will have choices in how they interact with the content, such as through nature walks, interactive slideshows, or video-based learning. Activities will connect to real-world experiences, including Indigenous perspectives on BC’s native trees. Group discussions and peer collaboration will support social learning, while scaffolding and optional challenge levels will allow for differentiated support.
To accommodate diverse learning styles, tree identification materials will be available in various formats. Visual supports include infographics, comparison charts, and labeled images, while auditory learners will benefit from videos with captions and audio recordings. Tactile learners can engage through hands-on exploration, such as collecting leaves and touching bark. Language supports, including bilingual resources and Indigenous terminology, will make learning more inclusive for all students.
Students will have multiple ways to show their understanding. They can create digital or physical nature journals, present findings through slideshows or videos, or complete interactive worksheets. Assistive technology, such as speech-to-text tools and alternative input methods, will support students with writing or motor challenges. Group projects and peer feedback will further encourage engagement and diverse perspectives.
By incorporating UDL and CAST principles, this learning resource ensures that all students, regardless of ability, background, or learning style, can develop ecological literacy in a way that works best for them.
A rationale for your technology choices.
The technology selected enhances interactive, inquiry-based learning, making tree identification engaging and accessible for elementary students.
These tools create a dynamic, inclusive, and engaging learning experience, ensuring students actively explore, collaborate, and apply their knowledge.
At the end of this course:
Module 1:
Students will be able to recognize and name different BC native trees.
Module 2:
Students will be able to identify different types of trees based on their physical attributes.
Module 3:
Students will be able to understand the ecological importance of BC native trees.
Let’s embark on an exciting journey into the world of British Columbia’s native trees! In this module, you will learn about the diverse coniferous and deciduous trees that are vital to our local ecosystems. You’ll get to identify these trees, discover how they adapt to different environments, and understand their roles in nature.
Coniferous Trees:
Deciduous Trees:
Characteristics: These trees celebrate the seasons by changing colours and shedding their leaves each fall. They reproduce by growing flowers that turn into fruits or nuts. They are also known as broadleaf trees or hardwoods.
(From left to right: Bigleaf Maple, Black Cottonwood, Bitter Cherry)
Tree Exploration Walk: Put on your explorer hats as we go on a nature walk around our school or a nearby park. You’ll observe different trees, gather interesting facts, and see firsthand the trees we’re learning about. This will help you connect what we learn in class with the real world!
Tree Profile Journal
Edited OER Resource: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XcjdqTznjlS4Q6kCOvoh6BGw6QzMxPso/view
https://natureinspiredlearning.com
Tree Book – learning to recognize trees of British Columbia
https://portal.fpbc.ca/Files/students/Gr4-5wonderfulworkingsofwood.pdf
Deciduous Trees:
Leaves:
Simple: just one leaf, undivided
Compound: the leaf is composed of many leaflets
Arrangements of leaf buds:
Opposite: the leaves or branches are attached directly across from each other
Alternate: The leaves or branches are attached singly and alternate.
SMOOTH ROUGH
Edges of the leaves:
Smooth: the leaf edges are smooth or the lobes of the leaf are wavy
Rough: The leaf edges are toothed or the lobes of the leaf are pointy.
Narrow Broad
Blade Shape:
Broad: Leaves wider at the base then the tip.
Narrow: Leaves longer than they are wide.
Coniferous Trees:
Needles: The needles are attached to the step, either in bundles or singly.
Scales: The leaves are overlapping scales
Tree Identification
Instructions:
https://treebee.ca/identify-a-tree/
Instructions:
https://padlet.com/ellameldrum99/post-your-pictures-and-descriptions-that-you-found-w0tc8x50tlg7hkh1
I’m sure we have all heard that trees are important to us as human beings and our environment, but why are they important? In this module you will learn through multiple resources the ecological importance of trees, you will be able to then explore the importance of trees within your own research! After viewing the material I have provided for you, you will find your own resources that you find, then you can explore the resources that your peers have found!
VIDEO:
Watch this video to learn more about why trees are important through specifically learning about the 6 key pillars of how trees help us and our environment.
READING:
Read the following article to understand the importance of trees:
https://www.savatree.com/resource-center/tree-varieties/why-trees/
It is now YOUR turn!
Instructions:
Scan the QR code or press the link and add a discussion post to the forum
https://padlet.com/ellameldrum99/why-do-you-think-trees-are-important-to-ecosystems-89q82luynxce3cdb
Formative Assessments:
Formative Learning Activities:
Each module has a formative assessment that is engaging for the learner.
Module 1: Tree Profile Booklet
This formative assessment allows students to apply their understanding of how to identify different BC native trees by their basic physical characteristics, in a way that engages them with their immediate natural environment. Students will select trees within their local surroundings, such as schoolyards, parks, or neighbourhood areas, and use the information they’ve learned about tree characteristics to detail each tree’s identity in their Tree Profile Booklets. This inquiry-based formative assessment encourages students to actively interact with their real-life surroundings to demonstrate and reinforce their knowledge of the material covered in class.
Feedback for this assessment will be provided to learners individually, focusing on their engagement and participation in creating the booklet and their interaction with the content. Additionally, feedback will address their contribution to discussions in class and any shared insights on their peers’ observations, fostering a collaborative learning environment.
Module 2: Tree Identification Activity/ Discussion
This formative assessment allows students to discuss their understanding of how to identify trees using their physical attributes in a way that engages them through their physical surroundings and understanding the different characteristics of different trees. Students can choose their own tree within their environmental surroundings and use the information they have learnt about tree characteristics to identify its name. This inquiry-based formative assessment will enable students to engage in their real-life surroundings to demonstrate their knowledge about the material they have learned.
Feedback for this assessment will be provided to learners individually regarding their engagement and participation in the activity and discussion and their interaction with others’ discussions and comments.
Module 3: Research Discussion Activity
This formative assessment allows students to demonstrate their understanding of the importance of trees by researching and sharing the resources they find and engaging with resources other peers find. This allows the instructor to assess the learners’ understanding through their chosen resources and their comments. This inquiry-based formative assessment will enable students to engage in their own research and build their own knowledge through the exploration of resources.
Feedback for the assessment will be provided to the learners individually in regards to their resource selection and more specifically their reasoning for their selection, as well as their engagement with peers’ resources researched.
Tree Ambassador Portfolio (40%)
Overview:
The Tree Ambassador Portfolio invites students to embody the role of an ambassador for a tree they have studied, demonstrating a deep understanding of its characteristics and ecological importance. This project is thoughtfully designed to be inclusive, ensuring all students can fully participate and express their learning, regardless of any barriers they might face.
Components:
Flexible Completion Options:
Assessment Rationale:
The Tree Ambassador Portfolio is designed as a comprehensive summative assessment that encapsulates all learning outcomes from the course, facilitating a deep integration of knowledge about British Columbia’s native trees. This project is structured to assess students’ understanding across multiple domains: content knowledge, creativity, conservation advocacy, and presentation skills. Each of these areas is critical for students to effectively function as ambassadors for their chosen trees, advocating for environmental stewardship within their communities.
The assessment criteria are mapped to the proficiency scale below, that includes ‘Emerging,’ ‘Developing,’ ‘Proficient,’ and ‘Extending’ levels, which are particularly suitable for elementary students as they reflect gradual and achievable progressions in learning. This scaling helps in accurately gauging the student’s current stage of understanding and provides a clear path for future improvement. It also ensures that the assessment is adaptable to a wide range of abilities, making it inclusive for elementary-aged students.
British Columbia’s elementary schools use a proficiency scale instead of letter grades for K-grade 9. Therefore our grading scale will be based off of the proficiency scale using “emerging” “developing” “proficient” “extending” that are clearly outlined and described below:
Resources:
https://dev.greatbearrainforesttrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Treebook.pdf
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xQI5vEcnfEQh7dZBuhLfmncvFOUYkkDBzbSxMJjP9qc/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XcjdqTznjlS4Q6kCOvoh6BGw6QzMxPso/view
https://www.fpbc.ca/public-interest/student-resources/educational-resources/
https://natureinspiredlearning.com/pinecone-coloring-pages/
https://padlet.com/ellameldrum99/post-your-pictures-and-descriptions-that-you-found-w0tc8x50tlg7hkh1
https://padlet.com/ellameldrum99/why-do-you-think-trees-are-important-to-ecosystems-89q82luynxce3cdb
https://portal.fpbc.ca/Files/students/Gr4-5wonderfulworkingsofwood.pdf
https://programmingconcepts.opened.ca/
https://www.savatree.com/resource-center/tree-varieties/why-trees/
When designing a learning resource on British Columbia’s native trees, we want to ensure that every learner can participate and succeed. Our project introduces elementary students to common species like Douglas-fir, Western red cedar, and Garry Oak, helping them understand and appreciate the natural environment around them. One of the main activities from our Blueprint assignment is a nature walk, where students observe and sketch different types of trees in their local area. This hands-on approach encourages curiosity and allows learners to practice identifying features such as leaves, bark, and cones. However, we recognize that this may present barriers if some learners lack access to safe green spaces or face mobility challenges.
To address these issues, we plan to offer alternative or virtual options. For example, we can use online photo collections, short videos, or tools like Google Earth to showcase various tree species and habitats. This ensures that students who cannot participate in an in-person walk still have meaningful opportunities to observe and learn. According to the Right to Education resource from Inclusive Education Canada, education providers must identify and address barriers to learning, making it essential to offer flexible solutions that accommodate all students.
Beyond the nature walk, we believe that flexibility is key to supporting diverse learners. Instead of relying on one type of assignment, we include choices such as writing a journal, creating a slideshow, or completing an online quiz. This range of formats allows students to showcase their knowledge in ways that align with their strengths and personal circumstances.
By proactively reducing barriers – like access to nature, technology, or different learning preferences – we’re creating a more inclusive experience for everyone involved. Our goal is for each student to gain a deeper appreciation for BC’s forests and develop the skills needed to explore, enjoy, and protect the natural world in their own communities.
Blog post URL: katenelsonstudies.opened.ca/blog-post-3-2/
From my perspective, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a powerful framework that challenges the traditional “one-size-fits-all” mindset in education. Instead of waiting to adapt materials once barriers are identified, UDL encourages instructors to proactively design courses and classrooms so that all students, regardless of their backgrounds or abilities, can fully engage. The UDL guidelines, developed by CAST, center on three foundational principles: Multiple Means of Engagement, Multiple Means of Representation, and Multiple Means of Action & Expression. By intentionally weaving these principles into teaching – from how content is presented to the ways students are allowed to demonstrate knowledge – an environment emerges where every learner can thrive.
For example, an instructor might post diverse materials – like captioned videos, infographics, and articles at varying reading levels – to cater to different preferences or needs. Students, in turn, can choose how they best consume information, whether they prefer reading, listening, or watching.
Reflecting on one of my classes from last semester, I noticed significant gaps in how UDL principles were applied. The physical classroom layout immediately posed a challenge: the projector screen was positioned in such a way that students seated along the wall had a limited view of the lecture slides. This setup unintentionally excluded anyone who, for various reasons, might need or prefer to sit in a less central part of the room – whether they deal with mobility concerns or simply strive late and find themselves in the periphery. Additionally, the course relied heavily on specialized software that had to be accessed through a laptop or designated campus computer labs. At the time, I only had a tablet, making it much harder to complete certain assignments and fully participate in the in-class exercises.
To better align with UDL, the instructor could have offered multiple ways to access the software—perhaps through web-based platforms or simplified mobile-friendly applications. They might have also ensured that the classroom was arranged so that no student’s view of the presentation was obstructed. Furthermore, providing alternative devices or loaner laptops would have helped ensure equitable access for those who did not possess the required technology. Even simple steps like rotating seats or posting lecture materials in an online repository would have gone a long way toward creating a more inclusive environment.
Ultimately UDL is not about accommodating a select few; it is about designing learning experiences that adapt to the variety of ways people learn. By mindfully incorporating the UDL guidelines, instructors can cultivate a sense of belonging and agency among all students – fostering an atmosphere where everyone is encouraged to succeed on their own terms.
URL for this blog:
katenelsonstudies.opened.ca/?p=197
Experiential learning has been one of the most meaningful ways I have learned new skills. Unlike traditional instruction, which often involves memorization and passive learning, this applied approach allows me to actively engage, make mistakes, and truly understand concepts through practice. Rooted in constructivist principles, this approach encourages real-world application, self-reflection, and collaboration to help learners develop a deeper connection to their subject matter.
One of the most memorable applied learning situations I’ve had was working as a barista. I wasn’t handed a textbook on customer service – I had to learn by doing. Making drinks, handling customer interactions, and problem-solving on the fly forced me to engage with the learning process actively. I made mistakes, received immediate feedback, and improved over time. This practical method reinforced my understanding of customer service far better than a traditional lecture would have.
If I were designing a learning environment for sustainability education, I would incorporate this approach by integrating hands-on community initiatives. Instead of just reading about climate change, students could participate in conservation efforts, analyze environmental impacts, and create sustainability initiatives, such as tree planting. This type of learning fosters critical thinking and a stronger engagement with the content – something I believe is essential for genuine understanding.
Darren Zhang’s post on experiential learning reinforced my belief that balancing real-world engagement with structured feedback is crucial for meaningful learning. Unlike direct instruction, which often provides immediate correction but limited application, experiential learning requires learners to take an active role in their development. Zhang’s insights highlight why structured feedback is particularly vital in this context—without it, the hands-on experience may lack direction or lead to reinforcement of incorrect assumptions.
Neuroscientific research supports this idea as well. Sorenson-Unruh (2019) explains that active engagement helps strengthen neural connections, which improves long-term memory retention. This aligns with my own experiences – learning by doing has always helped me remember and apply knowledge more effectively.
Yangtao Kong’s research (2021) also reinforces my perspective. He emphasizes how practical application in education boosts motivation and classroom engagement. I completely agree – when I feel that my learning has real-world relevance, I’m much more invested in the process. Language learning, driving practice, and this class are great examples of the constructivist approach to learning I have witnessed in my own life that are useful for real-world scenarios.
Experiential learning isn’t just about gaining knowledge – it’s about understanding concepts in a way that sticks. Compared to traditional teaching methods, which focus on passive absorption of information, this interactive method requires learners to engage, reflect, and adjust their thinking based on experience. This makes learning more meaningful and applicable.
Incorporating experiential learning into instructional design can create richer, more engaging learning environments. Whether it’s in a classroom, a workplace, or a personal learning journey, real-world practice fosters deeper comprehension and long-term retention. For me, learning through practice has been the most effective way to develop practical skills, and I believe it should be integrated into more educational settings.
Zhang, D. (2025). Post 2: Experiential Learning [Blog post]. https://maweika.opened.ca/2025/02/
Sorenson-Unruh, C. (2019). Reflective Teaching Evolution: Learning – The Neuroscience and the Neuromyths. https://clarissasorensenunruh.com/2019/04/20/5r-adult-learning-assignment-learning-the-neuroscience-and-the-neuromyths/
Wighton, D. J. (1991). Simulation debriefing: applying Kolb’s model of experiential learning to improve classroom practices. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/items/4f3aa288-0ef4-4a0a-b296-d46484d2b73a
Kong, Y. (2021). The Role of Experiential Learning on Students’ Motivation and Classroom Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 771272–771272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272
For this blog post, I chose the prompt that resonated the most with me. As I continue my journey in this course, I’ve been reflecting on learning theories and how they shape the way we engage with knowledge. Constructivism, in particular, stands out as a powerful framework for understanding education in digital spaces.
The first time I took an online course, I felt disconnected. Without a classroom or in-person discussions, I wasn’t sure how to engage. I submitted assignments, watched lectures, and participated in forums, but something was missing. Then, as I interacted more – reading classmates’ responses, questioning ideas, and applying theories – I realized I wasn’t just absorbing information. I was constructing my own understanding.
This realization aligns with constructivism, a learning theory that sees knowledge as something we build rather than passively receive. Through discussion, reflection, and hands-on application, constructivist learning turns education into an interactive, student-driven process.
So how does constructivism translate into digital learning? From my experience as both a student and a classroom volunteer, three key elements stand out:
One of the biggest concerns about online education is isolation. In my first blog post, I reflected on how face-to-face learning fosters community. However, I’ve since come to appreciate how digital spaces create connection in different but equally meaningful ways.
The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison et al., 2000; Kreijns et al., 2014) highlights three essential components of successful online learning:
When courses integrate discussion boards, peer collaboration, and interactive activities, students engage dynamically, reinforcing the idea that knowledge is something we co-create rather than just receive.
Blended and online learning work best when they encourage ongoing reflection rather than relying solely on high-stakes exams. Constructivist learning thrives when students:
Even writing this blog post is an example of constructivist learning – rather than just summarizing theories, I’m connecting them to my experiences and generating new insights.
One of the most powerful aspects of constructivism is that students are not just passive recipients of knowledge – they actively create it.
In my volunteer work in a Grade 2 classroom, I’ve seen how digital tools – such as interactive literacy resources and instructional videos – allow students to engage with content at their own pace and take ownership of their learning. This mirrors Online Collaborative Learning (OCL), which encourages students to generate and share knowledge rather than simply absorb information (Bates, 2014: Teaching in a Digital Age: Learning Theories and Online Learning).
In online university courses, this constructivist approach might look like:
This shift – from passive learning to active knowledge creation – is what makes constructivism so effective in digital and distributed education.
As a future elementary school teacher, I plan to:
In particular, I also now recognize the importance of instructor presence as discussed by Barnes (2020). A well-designed online or hybrid course isn’t just about content delivery – it’s about the teacher engaging students, fostering discussion, and providing meaningful feedback. Without teaching presence, even the best-structured online courses can feel disconnected.
In my first blog post, I explored how distributed education challenges our ideas of place in learning. “Place Is Differently, Not Less, Important Online” reinforces this, arguing that online learning environments are not lesser versions of traditional classrooms – they are simply different. (Bayne et al., 2020)
Students today learn from anywhere – cafés, dorm rooms, libraries, workplaces. Learning isn’t about being in a physical classroom; it is about connection, interaction, and engagement.
Looking back – from struggling with online learning to embracing digital and hybrid education – I see how constructivism has shaped my experience. When courses foster collaboration, reflection, and student-driven learning, online education becomes more interactive, engaging, and meaningful.
As both a student and a future educator, I know constructivism will guide the way I teach and learn – because education isn’t about location, but about engagement, reflection, and growth.
Blog: Reaffirming the core of hybrid learning: pedagogy before technology. https://www.cypherlearning.com/blog/k-20/pedagogy-first-technology-second-the-key-to-successful-hybrid-classes
Recent Comments